MISSION AND VISION: GOALS AND PURPOSES OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
J.C MEEROFF MD, Ph.D. Clinical
Associate Prof of Medicine, FAU
SUSANA MEEROFF Director of Health Services and Administration
South Florida Institute of
Integrative Medicine
“Medicine is a sociopsychosomatic professional
discipline or is not Medicine”
“The
practice of medicine is a trained art based on science, technology, and
philosophy”
“To be
efficient, all contemporary Medicine should be integrative”
“Those who
consult with the doctor will get something good and will go back home
healthier. The virtue of Medicine is to help not only those who practice
Medical Arts but also all individuals who are in touch with Medicine”
INTRODUCTION
Medicine is one of the oldest
professions in the history of the world. Medicine is a field of knowledge related to
healing and other aspects of health and disease. There are documents from ancient
Egyptian times (from around 3000 BC) indicating the existence of doctors’ or
healers and in this context, the medical practitioner Imhotep (circa 2600 BC)
produced a written work chronicling over 200 different medical conditions. The
Hippocratic Corpus (circa 400 BC) contains the principles of medical knowledge
from the golden era of Greek advanced knowledge.
Despite that seniority, it is still
not clear what Medicine is, nor do that contemporary practitioners of Medicine
have a well-defined concept of what are the purpose and goals of Medicine. As A
Einstein emphasized may be that “the
problem involved is too vast for our limited minds” so we can’t put light on
the issue yet. Nevertheless, since Medicine is a vital activity in most present-day
human societies, it is important to find some sort of approximation and/or
compromise to try to understand what medical practitioners can and should do
with their profession(s).
Philosophers, scientists, sociologists, technocrats, and others have
different views of the mission and vision of Medicine. A very popular teleological-and pragmatic
approach indicates that Medicine is an art based on science. Contrarily, for
economists and politicians, Medicine is a hands-on everyday service that can be
used to tackle social undesirable situations (the so-called medicalization of
sociopolitical problems).
We adhere to the teleological position that Medicine has particular
intrinsic goals focused on outcomes that we inherently value. We also believe
that the contemporary Pragmatic Integrative Model of Medicine interprets those
goals better than any other model of Medicine
Integrative Medicine is a contemporary approach to wellness that
combines all forms of conventional and non-conventional medical practices
provided that they can be effective, properly tested, verifiable and
reproducible.
VISION AND MISSION OF
MEDICAL PROFESSIONS
Following a stoic-pragmatic viewpoint, we can argue that Medicine has multiple, different intrinsic goals. We estimate that such a view is compatible with most modern medical models. Unfortunately, Medicine does not have clear-cut boundaries, and, as Schamme said, it is impossible to conceptually separate Medicine from other practices solely by referring to its “alleged goals, because these goals are shared with several other disciplines”. What we shouldn’t due, is restrict Medicine to a simplistic and narrow clinical encounter between a patient and a doctor as Cassell proposed some time ago. We argue that the role of a physician is as follows: 1. Skilled at individual patient care; 2. Engaged in research to advance knowledge; 3. Educate individuals and communities about health and disease and 4. Keep patients and communities from harm and injustice.
In our view a partial list of goals for Medicine ought to
include the following:
Gain advanced knowledge of the
nature of human life and the structure and functions and dysfunctions of the
human organism
Better understand the concepts of
health and disease
Introduce more precise diagnostic tools and more efficient medical treatments
Teach and assist individuals,
families, and communities to recognize and go by the different stages of life
and to withstand the distress of human existence
Diagnose, prevent, treat and heal injuries,
illnesses, and diseases
Help people regain functional allostatic
balance leading to restoration of health
Relief and comfort ill
individuals, families, and communities
Assist people to live longer, more productive, and more enjoyable lives
THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH:
AN HISTORICAL RELIC OR AN INVALUABLE ETHICAL GUIDE?
The Hippocratic Oath is an ancient historical ethical/moral code
of conduct used for centuries as a universal pledge of medical ethical conduct. Its
origin is attributed to a mysterious figure known as the great Greek physician Hippocrates of Cos.
Nobody can ascertain if such an individual was a real person or a mystical creation.
Possible, the oath was written by a follower or a learned scribe from
Pythagoras’ philosophical school. The fact is that under Hippocrates' name the
principles of Greek Medicine were written and passed to further generations.
The Hippocratic Corpus contains textbooks, lectures, research, notes, and
philosophical essays on multiple medical subjects. These works were
written for different audiences, both healers and laymen, and were sometimes
written from opposing viewpoints therefore significant contradictions can be
found between works in the Corpus.
Ever since the oath was created, health care graduates all
over the world have sworn to some version of it. The oath addresses two
important principles: benefitting the ill and protecting patients against
personal and social harm and injustice. The oath has been, modified over
the centuries to fit the opinions of the time, ranging from the pale,
legalistic original version of the Greeks, and to Maimonides’ poetic prayer, to
the more scientific contemporary versions. Curiously, the old version of the
oath involves the healer, the patient, and God, while the modern versions
involve the physician, the patient, and the community.
We argue that the oath (or code of ethics or pledge as some
want to rename it) is of great value and must be preserved. It must also be
upgraded to fit into contemporary thinking, but without sacrificing the essential
values contained in the original version.
We suggest that an attempt must be made to generate a universal
consensus for a common oath/pledge/code that is flexible enough to accommodate
most of the conflicting beliefs about Medicine.
The America Medical Association (AMA) has one code that can
serve as the basic starting point of the suggested universal new version. The
post-1980 AMA code reads as follows
Preamble:
The medical profession has long subscribed to a body of ethical statements
developed primarily for the benefit of the patient. As a member of this
profession, a physician must recognize responsibility not only to patients, but
also to society, to other health professionals, and self. The following
Principles adopted by the AMA are not laws, but standards of conduct that
define the essentials of honorable behavior for the physician.
I. A physician shall be
dedicated to providing competent medical care, with compassion and respect for
human dignity and rights.
II. A physician shall deal honestly with patients and
colleagues, and strive to expose those physicians deficient in character or
competence, or who engage in fraud or deception.
III. A
physician shall respect the law and also recognize a responsibility to seek
changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the
patient.
IV. A
physician shall respect the rights of patients, of colleagues, and of other
health professionals, and shall safeguard patient confidence within the constraints
of the law.
V. A
physician shall continue to study, apply and advance scientific knowledge, make
relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public, obtain
consultation, and use the talents of other health professionals when indicated.
VI. A
physician shall, in the provision of appropriate patient care, except in
emergencies, be free to choose whom to serve, with whom to associate, and the
environment in which to provide medical services.
VII. A
physician shall recognize a responsibility to participate in activities
contributing to an improved community.
VIII. A physician shall, while caring for a
patient, regard responsibility to the patient as paramount.
IX. A
physician shall support access to medical care for all people.
Also, the World
Medical Association currently
has a code (2017 Declaration of Geneva) that reads as follows
AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION:
·
I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE to dedicate my life to the
service of humanity;
·
THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF MY PATIENT will be
my first consideration;
·
I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my
patient;
·
I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human
life;
·
I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of age, disease
or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political
affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing, or any other factor to
intervene between my duty and my patient;
·
I WILL RESPECT the secrets that are confided in
me, even after the patient has died;
·
I WILL PRACTICE my profession with conscience
and dignity and in accordance with good medical practice;
·
I WILL FOSTER the honor and noble traditions of
the medical profession;
·
I WILL GIVE to my teachers, colleagues, and
students the respect and gratitude that is their due;
·
I WILL SHARE my medical knowledge for the
benefit of the patient and the advancement of healthcare;
·
I WILL ATTEND TO my own health, well-being, and
abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard;
·
I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate
human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;
·
I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely, and upon
my honor.
There are many similarities between the
two codes presented here. We argue that they can be easily unified for universal
usage among health care professionals all over the globe.
SELECTD REFERENCES
Bailey
I. (1991) Who wrote the Hippocratic oath? NEJM 106:91-92
Boorse
C. On the distinction between disease and Illness. Philosophy &
Public Affairs. 1975; 5(1): 49- 68.
Cassell
EJ (1991) The Nature of Suffering: And the Goals of Medicine.
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195156164.001.0001
Clark
SA (2018) The Impact of the Hippocratic
Oath in 2018: The Conflict of the Ideal of the Physician, the Knowledgeable
Humanitarian, Versus the Corporate Medical Allegiance to Financial Models
Contributes to Burnout. 2018 Jul 30. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3076
Lockwood
AH (2004), The Physician's Role in Society: Enhancing the Health of Individuals
and the Public. AMA J of Ethics Virtual Mentor. 2004;6(4):189-190. doi:
10.1001/virtualmentor.2004.6.4.msoc2-0404.
Meeroff
JC & Meeroff S (2020). Doctor-patient relationship in the modern world. https://www.meeroffmedicine.com/articles/The
Doctor-Patient relationship
Meeroff
JC. (2018). A pragmatic model of health and disease under the integrative
paradigm. https://www.meeroffmedicine.com/articles /The contemporary pragmatic
model of health and disease.
Pellegrino,
ED: “The ‘Telos’ of Medicine and the Good of the Patient,” in Clinical
Bioethics: A Search for the Foundations edited by Corrado Viafora, Springer,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Vol. 26 International Library of Ethics Law, and
the New Medicine, 2005: 21- 32.
Schramme
T(2017) Chapter . 9 The goals of Medicine
in The Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine, Thomas Schramme &
Steven Edwards Eds
Weil
A. (2022) What is Integrative Medicine https://integrativemedicine.arizona.edu/about/definition.html
World
Medical Association. Declaration of July 9; 2018
https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/
Copyright
2022 © JCMeeroff, MD, PhD.
All rights reserved.
How to cite this article:
MEEROFF JC & MEEROFF S
(2022). MISSION AND VISION: GOALS AND PURPOSES OF INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE.
https://www.meeroffmedicine.com/articles/
Goals and purpose of medicine
No comments:
Post a Comment